🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a draft bill that include decreasing the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least half of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary says the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The advocate stated BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator commented: “The company operates its operations according with relevant national regulations. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, noting that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.